Remember the baby in the tumble dryer story we ran earlier this week? Turns out the tot was in the care of a BABYSITTER when the incident occurred - and his outraged mum is calling for her to be jailed!
Little Samier Bush was put inside a commercial washing machine while playing a game of peek-a-boo with his babysitter and her male friend. The 'prank' was captured on the launderette's CCTV, and uploaded to YouTube, going viral.
Samier can been seen being put into the machine before the door automatically locks and starts its cycle.
Although a worker at the laundry raced to disable the machine, it still took an alarmingly long time to get Samier out.
At first, it was assumed the adults present were the baby's parents, but Samier's mum Saskia David knew nothing of the events or the video until the police visited her on Tuesday.
She told interviewer Ann Curry on USA's Today Show:
"I just want to tell Sandra [the babysitter] this is not over because everybody said on the news that I wasn't pressing charges, and I am."
The prosecutor's office has said they will not press charges because there was no criminal intent, but Saskia says the babysitter should be punished for what she and her companion did to Samier:
"She sat there and watched him put my baby in a washer. So it was both of their fault," Saksi insisted, adding that the footage made her feel sick and angry.
"I was, like, I know that ain't my child, oh, oh my god," she said describing her reaction to the video.
Ms David said that despite his ordeal, Samier is in good health except for a slight scratch to his head - which the babysitter had reportedly initially told her he had got from falling down the stairs.
The babysitter told NBC news that the incident was an accident and that her male friend was just playing peek-a-boo and did not put Samier in the machine intentionally.
How angry must Samier's mum be?
Do you think the babysitter and her friend should face charges?
Comments
We welcome intelligent discussion, debate and differing opinions on Parentdish. Personal attacks (on other users, authors or individuals) and trolling will not be tolerated. We will consider removing any content that others might find offensive or threatening. We will not tolerate racism, sexism, homophobia or other forms of hate-speech. If you think a comment is inappropriate, please click to report it. We aim to make this commenting platform lively, entertaining, welcoming and safe. Be aware that your user name and profile image will be displayed with your comment.
Add a Comment
eassy justice put both of them in the same machine and let it go full cycle!!
February 03 2013 at 7:12 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyLets see what we the public could think of doing to him for a game of peekaboo..stick him in one.
February 03 2013 at 4:38 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyCommon sense would always tell you NOT TO PUT A BABY IN A WASHING MACHINE, sorry guys but those of you who dont believe they should be punished are gullible and that's why this country is in such a mess because of do gooders, teach them a lesson they wont forget I say and make an example of what would happen if you lose your common sense one day and put someone's else life at risk!! Sad Sad stupid world we live in...
June 07 2012 at 9:14 AM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyi think its awful she the baby sitter and her mate should be sent down for life ,cruel, they dont even deseve life
June 06 2012 at 7:45 PM Report abuse Permalink +2 rate up rate down ReplyIf charges aren't made then where will we draw the line? If people are allowed to endanger the lives of others with impunity just because the intention to harm wasn't there then all sorts of incidents will occur and there will be no ramifications. Everyone is aware that children should not be placed into tumble dryers because of the obvious risk, therefore the baby was deliberately placed in unnecessary risk. If you receive a fine for speeding, why on earth shouldn't these people who were responsible for the safety of the child not face charges for increasing the risk of harm as opposed to ensuring the child's safety?
May 27 2012 at 5:40 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyGood point but, unfortunately, the world is full of stupid people who do stupid things and putting them in jail is not going to change things or, indeed, them. It's not as if they are going to emerge at the end of their sentence a reformed character i.e. clever!
Perhaps the correct punishment here would be some SERIOUS community service?
Obviously not everyone is aware that children should not be put in washing machines!
my bad it is a baby
May 27 2012 at 4:15 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down Replyi think its a dog
May 27 2012 at 4:14 PM Report abuse Permalink rate up rate down ReplyInteresting how the news media can so easily get the wrong end of the stick in their rush for a good story. Clearly an emotive issue this, and rightly so, but why do so many posters have to go so OTT?
The, probable, facts are:-
1) It was, probably, a game of "peek-a-boo".
2) The guy, probably, did not realise the machine would start automatically.
3) When the machine started they both, rightly, panicked.
4) The baby was not seriously harmed.
5) The sitter lied about the baby's injury.
From this we conclude - no criminal intent, stupidity for sure! A realisation that they were in trouble and then an attempted cover-up, so perhaps some intent there. The US Child Endangerment law should cover the above and thus permit a case. Suitable outcome? Severe reprimand/caution for being stupid? How can you punish someone for being stupid? But that's up to the court and I don't know the penalties available under that law. I think a "caution" would apply here in the UK.
So let's stop calling for hands to be chopped off - in the Western World we are, hopefully, a little more civilised! And that punishment is for theft and, yes, you only get caught and punished twice.
As an aside, there is no requirement for a person looking after children to be licensed unless, I think, it is done as a business. The sitter was, probably, a friend of the mother. Not any more!
Thankfully the baby was not seriously injured but it could so easily have been a different, and very tragic, result and manslaughter, which includes causing death (without intent) by being careless or reckless OR just stupid, might then be an appropriate charge. I'm not sure that you can have "attempted" manslaughter since "attempt" suggests intention before the act and so the charge becomes attempted murder.
Personally, I am happy that the baby is OK and think that the shame the sitter and her friend will be feeling in their community might be punishment enough.
i fully agree with you glenn99adams and there it should him that is prosicuted because as soon as she saw what happened she tried to get the baby out straight away
May 25 2012 at 11:01 PM Report abuse Permalink +1 rate up rate down ReplyLooked to me like it was the male that grabbed the child before the female could act and put the child inside the drier then closed the door.
Having said that if this person had intended to harm this child I doubt he would have rushed around trying to get him or her out. It was a stupid prank that I would imagine he will never try again. I think a good bollocking is in order. The police will have more corroborating evidence to base a decision upon. For example if this man was always clowning around with this child and the child thought he was a good laugh or if he was terrified of him would give some indication as to what punishment is necessary.
Editor's picks
Load More ArticlesPopular videos
Why not check out? x





48 Comments